TOPEKA, KS — Authorities confirmed Tuesday that a local man has read, in full, the 47-page terms and conditions agreement for a popular cloud-storage application, and that he now has questions, several of which are described by legal experts as "genuinely alarming."

Darrell Fitch, 41, an actuary, reportedly spent eleven days reviewing the document before contacting the software company's support line to request clarification. He was placed on hold for four hours, transferred to an automated system, and ultimately emailed a PDF of the same terms and conditions he had already read.

"I have seventeen specific questions," Fitch told reporters from his kitchen, which he may or may not still legally own. "Question one concerns the clause granting the company a perpetual, irrevocable, royalty-free license to any content I store, including, and I want to be precise here, my taxes."

Fitch's questions reportedly include inquiries about a provision allowing the company to share data with "partners, affiliates, and entities that may not yet exist," a clause permitting service changes "up to and including discontinuation of reality as currently understood," and a footnote on page 39 written entirely in a font the document itself identifies as proprietary.

"Section 14(b) is technically a threat. I don't know who to report it to, but I feel someone should know."

Dr. Constance Aberfoyle, Senior Fellow of Consumer Bewilderment at the Midwest Institute for Contractual Opacity, said Fitch's situation, while unusual, was not entirely without precedent.

"We've seen perhaps four documented cases of full readership since 2003," Dr. Aberfoyle said. "In each instance, the individual developed what we call Informed Consent Syndrome — a condition characterized by awareness, distress, and an acute inability to click 'I Agree' without experiencing what one subject described as 'a cold, structural dread.'"

The software company, TrueVault Systems, issued a statement saying it takes user concerns seriously and encourages customers to review its updated terms, which as of Tuesday morning had been revised to include seventeen new subclauses and a binding arbitration requirement for questions about binding arbitration.

Fitch said he has not yet agreed to the terms, which means he has technically been using the service without authorization since 2019, a fact the company's legal team confirmed they are "aware of and fine with, for now."

Fitch's wife, Lena, said she agreed to the terms in 2019 in approximately four seconds by clicking a box while watching television, and that her experience has been entirely satisfactory.

"I store my photos there," she said. "It's fine."

At press time, Fitch had submitted his seventeen questions in writing and received an automated reply thanking him for his feedback, informing him that his message had been received, and noting that by sending the email he had agreed to a separate set of terms and conditions, available upon request.